‘It Was Set Up’ Whistleblower Spill Beans on What DHS Did on the Day of Trump’s Attempted Assassination

Whistleblowers have revealed that during an attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally, the majority of his security detail comprised Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) personnel instead of trained Secret Service agents, suggesting it was a setup.

In a post shared on Friday, July 19, 2024, Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) has raised serious concerns about the attempted assassination attack on former President Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania.

In a letter sent to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Friday, Hawley demanded answers about the security measures—or lack thereof—that were in place during the event.

According to whistleblowers who contacted Hawley, a significant portion of the security detail present at the rally were not Secret Service agents. Instead, they were personnel from the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) team, which typically handles criminal investigations rather than presidential security.

This revelation has prompted questions about the preparedness and competence of the security force assigned to protect Trump.

Hawley emphasized that the HSI personnel were not adequately trained for such a high-stakes task as protecting a former president.

The use of untrained and inexperienced staff for Trump’s security detail has been portrayed as a major lapse in protocol, raising suspicions about the intent behind the security arrangements.

Furthermore, the whistleblowers indicated that the event was treated as a “loose” security event by government officials.

This relaxed approach to security included the absence of canines at entry points, which are typically used to detect explosives and other threats. The lack of thorough security measures has led to increased scrutiny of the DHS’s handling of the situation.

Senator Hawley has called for an immediate investigation into the decision-making process that led to the deployment of HSI personnel instead of the Secret Service. He has demanded a detailed explanation from Secretary Mayorkas on why trained Secret Service agents were not prioritized for the rally, especially given the known risks associated with high-profile political events.

The allegations suggest that the DHS’s actions may have compromised the safety of the former president. Hawley’s letter underscores the severity of these claims, arguing that the apparent negligence could have had catastrophic consequences.

The senator’s demand for accountability reflects a broader concern about the politicization of security protocols and the potential for misuse of governmental power.

In the aftermath of these revelations, there has been a growing call for transparency and accountability within the DHS.

The implications of assigning unqualified personnel to such a critical security role have sparked debate over the integrity of current security practices and the need for stringent oversight.

As the investigation unfolds, the focus will remain on uncovering the reasons behind the DHS’s decisions and ensuring that such lapses do not recur.

The safety of public figures, particularly former presidents, hinges on robust and reliable security measures, and any deviation from these standards must be thoroughly examined and addressed.