Former Assistant US Attorney Delivers Bad News to Trump Over Charges in Arizona

Donald Trump could still be charged in Arizona for his alleged involvement in attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election. This possibility arises despite initial decisions by prosecutors to advise against indicting the former president.

Legal analyst Glenn Kirschner discussed these developments in a recent episode of The Legal Breakdown podcast as reported in an article published by Newsweek on Sunday, August 17

Kirschner, a former assistant U.S. attorney, and MSNBC legal analyst has been an outspoken critic of Trump. In the podcast, he expressed his surprise and dismay at learning that the Arizona grand jury had shown interest in indicting Trump.

The jury recently indicted 18 of Trump’s allies, but Trump himself was not among those charged.

“A dagger through the heart of this old prosecutor,” Kirschner remarked, reflecting on his reaction to the news. He was particularly concerned about the prosecutors’ decision to advise the grand jury against charging Trump.

According to Kirschner, this decision struck a deep blow, as it indicated that prosecutors were reluctant to fully pursue legal action against the former president.

The Arizona grand jury’s decision to consider charges against Trump highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding the former president’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Although Trump was not indicted in this round, the possibility of future charges remains open, particularly if new evidence or legal arguments emerge.

Kirschner’s comments suggest that there may be internal disagreements among legal experts and prosecutors about how to handle Trump’s case.

The decision not to indict Trump, despite the grand jury’s interest, raises questions about the strength of the evidence and the political implications of such a move.

As the legal situation continues to evolve, Trump’s legal team and supporters are likely to monitor developments closely.

The former president has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to the 2020 election and has framed the various investigations against him as politically motivated.

The potential for charges in Arizona adds to the growing list of legal challenges Trump faces as he remains a central figure in American politics. With ongoing investigations and court cases in multiple states, the former president’s legal battles are far from over.

Kirschner’s analysis of The Legal Breakdown underscores the complexities of pursuing charges against a former president, particularly one with Trump’s political influence and following.

The decision to hold back on indicting Trump in Arizona may have been influenced by concerns about the broader impact of such a move.

While Trump was not indicted by the Arizona grand jury, the possibility of future charges remains. Kirschner’s commentary highlights the tension between the grand jury’s interest in charging Trump and the prosecutors’ recommendation not to do so.

This is another chapter in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Trump’s alleged actions during the 2020 election, and it is likely that further scrutiny and debate will continue.