Kevin O’Leary Mocks Clinton and Harris, Predicts What Democrats May Do If Harris Loses To Trump

Entrepreneur and television personality Kevin O’Leary recently took aim at top Democratic figures Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, cautioning the party against making assumptions about the upcoming election.

In a striking analogy, O’Leary compared the Democrats’ approach to selecting presidential candidates to the sale of a business, advising against settling for the first option presented.

According to statements shared on X account on Saturday, August 24, 2024, O’Leary highlighted the risks of presuming victory and overlooking the need for a rigorous selection process.

Drawing a parallel between the failed campaign of Hillary Clinton and the current positioning of Kamala Harris, O’Leary pointed out the dangers of prematurely anointing a candidate without considering potential outcomes.

Just as Clinton was seen as the inevitable choice in the past and faced defeat, O’Leary suggested that a similar fate might await Harris if the party neglects a more thorough and strategic candidate selection process.

The entrepreneur emphasized the importance of maximizing exposure and leveraging every opportunity to convey the party’s message to the electorate.

O’Leary expressed concern that by prematurely focusing on one candidate, the Democrats risk missing out on valuable airtime that could be used to engage with voters and build support for the party’s platform.

His message resonates with the notion that assuming victory can lead to complacency and missed opportunities to connect with voters effectively.

Using the analogy of selling a business, O’Leary underscored the importance of running a competitive process to ensure the best outcome.

Just as one would seek multiple offers and bids when selling a business to secure the most favorable deal, O’Leary urged the Democrats not to limit themselves to a single candidate but to explore a range of options to increase their chances of success.

By doing so, he argued, the party could avoid leaving valuable resources, whether in terms of money or votes, on the table.

O’Leary’s remarks serve as a reminder to the Democratic Party of the perils of assuming victory and the benefits of approaching candidate selection with caution and foresight.

His advice encourages the party to learn from past mistakes, such as premature confidence in Clinton’s candidacy, and to adopt a more strategic and inclusive approach in choosing their nominee for the upcoming election.

Kevin O’Leary’s criticism of the Democratic Party’s approach to candidate selection serves as a wake-up call, highlighting the dangers of complacency and the need for a structured and competitive process.

By heeding O’Leary’s advice and avoiding assumptions of victory, the Democrats could increase their chances of success and ensure they make the most of the opportunities presented in the upcoming election.