Russia’s triple win. Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia may find it harder to leave Russia’s sphere of influence than they think

Since gaining independence, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia have all generally sought to distance themselves from their Soviet pasts and strengthen their relationships with the West. But each has moved at its own pace, with Azerbaijan and Georgia rejecting Russia much more quickly and definitively.

In fact, within a few years of the Soviet Union’s collapse, Azerbaijan and Georgia, together with Ukraine and Moldova, formed the GUAM Organisation for Democracy and Economic Development, aimed at bolstering their post-communist transitions and limiting Russia’s regional influence.

By contrast, Armenia maintained close ties with Russia, not least to secure military support in its conflict with Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, where both Azerbaijanis and Armenians lived during Soviet times. Following the Soviet Union’s collapse, the two groups went to war over the territory, with the Armenian side ultimately securing de facto control.

In 1992, Armenian separatists established the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, and in 1994, a Russia-brokered ceasefire brought relative peace, at least for a while.

Since then, Russia has acted as a kind of guarantor of Armenian security, including during the brutal ground war that broke out in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020. The ceasefire deal that followed — which Russia also brokered — put Russian peacekeepers in charge of guarding the region for five years.

But when violence again erupted in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023, Russia did not intervene — a decision that partly reflected the need to direct limited military resources toward the war in Ukraine, though Azerbaijan’s status as a key energy supplier probably also made a difference.

As a result, Azerbaijan was able to seize control of the enclave, with Russia subsequently withdrawing its peacekeepers. What Azerbaijan perceived as French support for Armenia further encouraged it to move away from Europe, toward both Russia and Turkey.

Of the South Caucasus’s three post-Soviet states, Georgia embraced the West most fully — and paid a heavy price when Russia invaded in 2008 and backed two breakaway regions. Though relations with Russia normalized over time, Georgia remained wary and applied for European Union membership in 2022. But last month — just six months after receiving EU candidate status — Georgia’s parliament decided to push through a controversial “foreign agents” law, which mimics Russian legislation that has been used to target Kremlin critics.

The law — which requires NGOs and independent media that receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad to register as organizations “bearing the interests of a foreign power” — sparked massive popular protests, drew sharp Western criticism, and was initially vetoed by Georgian President Salome Zourabichvili before parliament voted to overturn her veto and forced the bill into law.

Since then, the EU has suspended Georgia’s accession process to the bloc, while the United States, for its part, has announced visa restrictions on Georgian government officials and a review of bilateral cooperation.

Georgian leaders’ stance reflects the fear that if they bow to Western pressure to join its anti-Russian alliance — or even maintain a pro-Western strategic orientation — Georgia could be the next Ukraine.

As Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze recently put it, “some” want a Georgian version of Ukraine’s 2014 Maidan uprising, which culminated in the ouster of the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, or a “second front” in the war against Russia.

But Georgia’s interests extend beyond staving off a Russian invasion, especially given how long the war in Ukraine has dragged on and how desperate Russia is for support. Georgian Dream might also be hoping to secure the return of the two breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The announcement that the government had “restored Georgia’s territorial integrity” would certainly give Georgian Dream a boost in this October’s general election.

Russia, too, would benefit from such an arrangement. Georgia’s strategic location between Europe and Asia makes it a valuable logistics and transit hub — useful, for example, for transporting oil from the Caspian Sea to Europe. Closer relations with Georgia would also create opportunities for Russia to organize railway communications to its ports, as well as to Iran and Armenia.